Book a Discovery Call
Book a Discovery Call
Transferable tax credits rarely trade at face value. The discount is not a fixed toll. It is a price on four specific risks, and most of them can be reduced before a credit ever goes to market.
Ask a sponsor what their tax credit is worth and most will quote the face value. Ask a buyer and you get a different number, usually somewhere between 85 and 95 cents on the dollar. That gap is often treated as a fixed cost of transferability, like a brokerage commission. It is not. It is a price on specific risks, and most of those risks can be reduced before a credit ever goes to market.
Under §6418, the buyer of a transferred credit steps into the seller's shoes on examination. If the credit is disallowed or recaptured, the buyer loses the benefit and can owe penalties on top. So the bid reflects four questions the buyer's counsel will ask, and the answers they cannot get.
Eligibility and basis. Is the facility what the seller says it is, and is the cost basis supportable? Bonus adders for domestic content or energy communities raise the credit but also raise the burden of proof.
Labor compliance. For most energy credits, prevailing wage and apprenticeship compliance is the difference between the base rate and five times the base rate. Payroll records reconstructed after the fact are one of the most common reasons a price gets chipped at signing.
FEOC. For projects beginning construction in 2026 or later, Foreign Entity of Concern rules apply at the component level. Fail the material assistance test and the entire credit is gone. Buyers are now asking for FEOC representations that many sellers cannot give without a traced supply chain.
Timing and size. Smaller, one-off credits from first-time sellers cost a buyer the same diligence effort as a large portfolio. That fixed cost gets spread across fewer dollars, and the discount widens accordingly.
Build the file for the buyer, not the return. A credit that qualifies on paper is not the same as a credit a buyer can underwrite quickly. Organizing eligibility support, basis, adder evidence, labor records, and FEOC tracing the way diligence teams review them shortens the process and removes reasons to reprice.
Insure what cannot be documented away. Tax credit insurance can cover disallowance and recapture, along with related interest, penalties, and defense costs. When a buyer no longer has to price in the worst case, the bid moves toward par, and more buyers can participate at all. The premium is a cost, so the test is simple: does the improvement in price exceed it?
Sell earlier, finance against it. A forward commitment from a buyer, signed during construction, can support advance financing against the transfer agreement. The sponsor gets capital when the project needs it rather than after placed in service, and the buyer gets a pipeline instead of a one-off.
Choose the buyers, do not broadcast the deal. Listing a credit widely can create the appearance of competition while exposing project data to parties with no real appetite. A short, vetted list of corporate buyers and credit-transfer counterparties, approached under NDA, usually produces better pricing tension and keeps the sponsor's information where it belongs.
A transfer moves the credit. It does not move the depreciation. For sponsors with limited tax capacity of their own, that depreciation can sit unused for years, which is why the decision between transfer, tax equity, and hybrid structures should be made on net proceeds, not headline price. Running a cost segregation study alongside the credit work shows exactly how much depreciation is at stake, and whether it is worth structuring around.
The credit market has matured quickly since 2023, but the pricing discipline on the sell side has not kept up. Sponsors who treat the discount as a negotiable risk premium, rather than a fixed toll, are the ones capturing the difference.